[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0711281432290.5566-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:36:26 -0500 (EST)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] New kobject/kset/ktype documentation and example code
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > Actually the current code doesn't seem to check whether kobj->ktype is
> > NULL or to use the value of kobj->kset->kobj.ktype. Is this an oversight?
>
> We just require the ktype.
No -- we should but we don't. Look at the code for kobject_init() and
kobject_add() in Greg's tree and you'll see. Neither of them checks
that kobj->ktype is set.
> > If there is no containing kset, the parent remains NULL. What happens
> > then? Does the kobject show up in the sysfs top-level directory?
>
> "If the kobject belonging to a kset has no parent kobject set, it will
> be added to the kset's directory. Not all members of a kset do
> necessarily live in the kset directory. If an explicit parent kobject is
> assigned before the kobject is added, the kobject is registered with the
> kset, but added below the parent kobject."
Yes, but what if neither kobj->parent nor kobj->kset is set?
Alan Stern
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists