[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1d4tudun5.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:42:22 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@...hat.com>, Ben Woodard <woodard@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
hbabu@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kexec: force x86_64 arches to boot kdump kernels on boot cpu
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> writes:
> Ok. Got it. So in this case we route the interrupts directly through LAPIC
> and put LVT0 in ExtInt mode and IOAPIC is bypassed.
>
> I am looking at Intel Multiprocessor specification v1.4 and as per figure
> 3-3 on page 3-9, 8259 is connected to LINTIN0 line, which in turn is
> connected to LINTIN0 pin on all processors. If that is the case, even in
> this mode, all the CPU should see the timer interrupts (which is coming
> from 8259)?
However things are implemented completely differently now. I don't think
the coherent hypertransport domain of AMD processors actually routes
ExtINT interrupts to all cpus but instead one (the default route?) is
picked.
So I think for the kdump case we pretty much need to use an IOAPIC
in virtual wire mode for recent AMD systems.
For current Intel systems I believe either scenario still works.
> Can you print the LAPIC registers (print_local_APIC) during normal boot
> and during kdump boot and paste here?
It's worth a look.
I still think we need to just use apic mode at kernel startup, and
be done with it.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists