[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <31816.1196280301@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:05:01 -0500
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"Tvrtko A. Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@...hos.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Out of tree module using LSM
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 19:52:46 GMT, Alan Cox said:
> > It might be better to identify the services (gateway, samba, file
> > server whatever) that are actually dealing with possible infected
> > "external" files and then define some generic interface that would
> > allow you to check those as the data appears.
>
> I am wondering if the right interface is actually more related to the
> existing audit interfaces ?
The problem there is that the audit interface just *records* - it doesn't
have the ability to say "No, I don't *think* so.." that the LSM interface has.
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists