linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.24-rc3-mm2: Result: hostbyte=0x01 driverbyte=0x00\nend

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 28 Nov 2007 22:12:38 +0000
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc3-mm2: Result: hostbyte=0x01
 driverbyte=0x00\nend_request: I/O error

> > [  225.378426] sd 2:0:1:0: [sdb] Result: hostbyte=0x01 driverbyte=0x00
> > [  225.378659] end_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 141295703
> > [  225.390133] sd 2:0:1:0: [sdb] Result: hostbyte=0x01 driverbyte=0x00
> > [  225.391988] end_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 141295703
> > [  225.392463] sd 2:0:1:0: [sdb] Result: hostbyte=0x01 driverbyte=0x00
> > [  225.392625] end_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 141295703
> > [  225.392999] sd 2:0:1:0: [sdb] Result: hostbyte=0x01 driverbyte=0x00
> > [  225.393161] end_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 141295703
> > [  225.393571] sd 2:0:1:0: [sdb] Result: hostbyte=0x01 driverbyte=0x00
> > [  225.393731] end_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 141295703
> > [  225.394382] sd 2:0:1:0: [sdb] Result: hostbyte=0x01 driverbyte=0x00
> > [  225.394544] end_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 141295703
> > [  225.395247] sd 2:0:1:0: [sdb] Result: hostbyte=0x01 driverbyte=0x00
> > [  225.395412] end_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 141295703
> 
> I don't know whether this failure was a scsi thing or an ata thing?

The ATA layer would print diagnostics if it failed the command so I'm a
bit baffled by the report. It looks like the SCSI mid layer rejected it
before we even got it ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/