[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <474CCBF0.5060809@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:01:20 -0800
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
CC: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sam@...nborg.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] [1/9] Core module symbol namespaces code and intro.
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 01:15:23PM -0800, Rick Jones wrote:
>
>>>The real problem is that these drivers are not in the upstream kernel.
>>>
>>>Are there common reasons why these drivers are not upstream?
>>
>>One might be that upstream has not accepted them. Anything doing or
>>smelling of TOE comes to mind right away.
>
>
> Which modules doing or smelling of TOE do work with unmodified vendor
> kernels?
At the very real risk of further demonstrating my Linux vocabulary
limitations, I believe there is a "Linux Sockets Acceleration"
module/whatnot for NetXen and related 10G NICs, and a cxgb3_toe (?)
module for Chelsio 10G NICs.
rick jones
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists