[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071129002245.33096661@siona>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:22:45 +0100
From: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
Cc: Tilman Schmidt <tilman@...p.cc>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: git guidance
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 00:20:46 +0100 (CET)
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de> wrote:
> On Nov 27 2007 23:33, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> >
> >It didn't work too well. The first result was one of maximal
> >embarrassment: I produced a patch that didn't even compile when
> >applied to the official tree. This shouldn't happen with git, right?
> >Well, it did. So now I'm back to keeping a virgin kernel source tree
> >alongside my development area in order to produce diffs. That can't
> >be right?
> >
> No, it can't. Use stgit/quilt ;p
No, use "git rebase --interactive" ;-)
I've tried stgit/guilt/quilt as well, but I could never quite get the
hang of it (adding the files _before_ editing is the difficult part.) On
the other hand, git rebase --interactive fit right into my workflow and
improved it massively.
But I guess it's all a matter of personal preference.
Haavard
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists