linux-kernel - Re: m68k build failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 28 Nov 2007 01:00:56 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Pierre Ossman <drzeus@...eus.cx>
Cc:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: m68k build failure

On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 09:48:56 +0100 Pierre Ossman <drzeus@...eus.cx> wrote:

> On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 22:07:23 -0800
> Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Current Linus tree give me this, with m68k allmodconfig:
> > 
> > FATAL: drivers/bluetooth/btsdio: sizeof(struct sdio_device_id)=12 is not a modulo of the size of section __mod_sdio_device_table=30.
> > Fix definition of struct sdio_device_id in mod_devicetable.h
> > 
> > which I haven't seen before.  Any ideas?
> > 
> 
> No the slightest. 12 seems like the correct, padded size. A size of 10 is just weird as the unpadded size is 9 bytes. Could you dump the __mod_sdio_device_table section so we can determine if it is cropped or just oddly padded.
> 

err, I'd rather not.  I have no shortage of bugs to be going on with here.

http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/cross-compilers/ has the i386->m68k
cross-compiler which I use.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/