[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071129032036.4c021617.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 03:20:36 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, trivial@...nel.org
Subject: Re: Trailing periods in kernel messages (was: [PATCH 6/6] tick: add
a missing dot in prink)
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:20:18 +0100 Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl> wrote:
> Well, for one it needlessly increases the size of log files.
> It also IMO just looks weird to have a trailing period only for some
> messages and it certainly is completely inappropriate for messages like:
I'll confess to stealthily deleting some of those periods when nobody is looking.
I don't find them to have any value and they do have some cost, including screen
real estate at the source-code level.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists