[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071129122324.GA11414@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:23:24 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH x86/mm 01/11] x86-32 thread_struct.debugreg
thanks, i've merged your 11 patches - they passed a basic build and boot
test as well.
Roland, you've done a lot of gdb / strace / glibc development, what
would you suggest for us to use as a ptrace regression checker? The
problem is that ptrace is not normally used on a default bootup of a
distro, and some of the ptrace features are really arcane. UML is an
extensive ptrace user, so running it might be a good start, but do you
know of any, more directed testsuite that is expected to hit all (or at
least a substantial percentage of) the various ptrace features that we
are affecting with these ptrace patches?
btw., your cleanup patches are having a nice effect on code quality as
well:
errors lines of code errors/KLOC
[before] arch/x86/ 5231 116998 44.7
[after] arch/x86/ 5132 116656 43.9
(the 'errors' column is the sum of all .c files as per the error count
of scripts/checkpatch.pl --file output)
it's refreshing to see life being brought back into the ptrace code
again :-)
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists