[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071129172134.74849579@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:21:34 +0100
From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
To: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kobject: make sure kobj->ktype is set before
kobject_init
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:04:40 +0100,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 10:54 -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Kay Sievers wrote:
> >
> > > > And if someone calls kobject_put() after kobject_init() to clean up,
> > > > their release function will not be called if they didn't set the ktype.
> > > > So the check really belongs into kobject_init() IMO.
> >
> > Right. And even though cleaning up no longer needs to drop a reference
> > to the kset, it still might need to free the kobject's name. So for
> > example, either of these sequences:
> >
> > kobject_init(); kobject_set_name();
> > kobject_set_name(); kobject_init();
> > ... ...
> > kobject_free(); kobject_free();
> >
> > would leak memory.
>
> Yeah, only the kobject_put() would free the name.
>
> > In fact, if we were designing the kobject API from scratch, I'd suggest
> > making the ktype value an argument to kobject_init() so that it
> > _couldn't_ be omitted.
>
> Sounds fine, maybe we should also pass the name along, so it will be
> obvious what happens here:
> int kobject_init(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_type *type, const char *fmt, ...)
Agreed. Better don't hide too much.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists