[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <p73myswyd0y.fsf@bingen.suse.de>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:09:33 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: tvrtko.ursulin@...hos.com, Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Subject: Re: Out of tree module using LSM
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> writes:
> If I want I can have 16 threads executing code in a shared object being
> written to by ten other programs at once and shared over a network while
> we are at it. Its probably not a good idea but I can do it if I have
> reason to.
Actually the kernel prevents writing to files which are executed currently
and you can also not execute what is currently open for writing.
That is what VM_DENYWRITE is good for.
Does not work for shared libraries though -- you cannot set VM_DENYWRITE
in user mmap aka ld.so Man page says
MAP_DENYWRITE
This flag is ignored. (Long ago, it signalled that attempts to write to the underlying file should fail
with ETXTBUSY. But this was a source of denial-of-service attacks.)
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists