[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071129225301.21536.91506.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:53:01 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, linux-am33-list@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 9/9] MN10300: Fix MTD JEDEC probe so that the ASB2303 bootprom
can be detected [2.6.24-rc3-mm2]
Fix MTD JEDEC probe so that the ASB2303 bootprom can be accessed. This is
presumably required because the bootprom is normally write-protected and so
the normal flash probes don't work as they require the ability to write to the
flash to send it commands.
In the condition of the excluded if-statement, uaddr is 1.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
---
drivers/mtd/chips/jedec_probe.c | 7 +++++++
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/chips/jedec_probe.c b/drivers/mtd/chips/jedec_probe.c
index 5074b5e..01a0550 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/chips/jedec_probe.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/chips/jedec_probe.c
@@ -1883,11 +1883,18 @@ static inline __u8 finfo_uaddr(const struct amd_flash_info *finfo, int device_ty
uaddr = finfo->uaddr[uaddr_idx];
+ /* the MN10300 ASB2303 board doesn't detect its bootprom if this test
+ * is allowed to take place, presumably because the flash is
+ * write-protected and so cannot be commanded for the purposes of
+ * probing
+ */
+#ifndef CONFIG_MN10300_UNIT_ASB2303
if (uaddr != MTD_UADDR_NOT_SUPPORTED ) {
/* ASSERT("The unlock addresses for non-8-bit mode
are bollocks. We don't really need an array."); */
uaddr = finfo->uaddr[0];
}
+#endif
uaddr_done:
return uaddr;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists