[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711281924580.20367@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 19:26:29 -0800 (PST)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"yamamoto@...inux.co.jp" <yamamoto@...inux.co.jp>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"containers@...ts.osdl.org" <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][for -mm] per-zone and reclaim enhancements for memory
controller take 3 [3/10] per-zone active inactive counter
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> ok, just use N_HIGH_MEMORY here and add comment for hotplugging support is not yet.
>
> Christoph-san, Lee-san, could you confirm following ?
>
> - when SLAB is used, kmalloc_node() against offline node will success.
> - when SLUB is used, kmalloc_node() against offline node will panic.
>
> Then, the caller should take care that node is online before kmalloc().
Hmmmm... An offline node implies that the per node structure does not
exist. SLAB should fail too. If there is something wrong with the allocs
then its likely a difference in the way hotplug was put into SLAB and
SLUB.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists