linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][for -mm] per-zone and reclaim enhancements for memory controller take 3 [3/10] per-zone active inactive counter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20071129124207.b59ae745.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:42:07 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	yamamoto@...inux.co.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi)
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	containers@...ts.osdl.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH][for -mm] per-zone and reclaim enhancements for memory
 controller take 3 [3/10] per-zone active inactive counter

On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:33:28 +0900 (JST)
yamamoto@...inux.co.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:

> > +static inline struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *
> > +mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(struct mem_cgroup *mem, int nid, int zid)
> > +{
> > +	if (!mem->info.nodeinfo[nid])
> 
> can this be true?
> 
> YAMAMOTO Takashi

When I set early_init=1, I added that check.
BUG_ON() is better ?

Thanks,
-Kame

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/