[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071129061139.GI26327@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 22:11:39 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Sample kset/ktype/kobject implementation
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 05:35:32PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 15:04:06 -0800,
> Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
>
> > static struct foo_obj *create_foo_obj(const char *name)
> > {
> > struct foo_obj *foo;
> > int retval;
> >
> > /* allocate the memory for the whole object */
> > foo = kzalloc(sizeof(*foo), GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!foo)
> > return NULL;
> >
> > /* initialize the kobject portion of the object properly */
> > kobject_set_name(&foo->kobj, "%s", name);
>
> Returncode not checked :)
good catch. Hm, I don't think anyone checks that function :)
> > foo->kobj.kset = example_kset;
> > foo->kobj.ktype = &foo_ktype;
> >
> > /*
> > * Register the kobject with the kernel, all the default files will
> > * be created here and the uevent will be sent out. If we were to
> > * call kobject_init() and then kobject_add() we would be
> > * responsible for sending out the initial KOBJ_ADD uevent.
> > */
> > retval = kobject_register(&foo->kobj);
> > if (retval) {
> > kfree(foo);
>
> kobject_put(foo) is needed since it gets you through kobject_cleanup()
> where the name can be freed.
No, kobject_register() should have handled that for us, right?
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists