linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched: cpu accounting controller (V2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071130133455.GA29679@elte.hu>
Date:	Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:34:55 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, skumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	menage@...gle.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: cpu accounting controller (V2)


* Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 01:35:13PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Here's V2 of the cpu acccounting controller patch, which makes 
> > > accounting scale better on SMP systems by splitting the usage counter 
> > > to be per-cpu.
> > 
> > thanks, applied. But you dont seem to have incorporated all of the 
> > review feedback from Andrew. (such as making cpuacct_subsys static)
> 
> cpuacct_subsys can't be made static, as I have pointed out at 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=119636730930886. [...]

ah, ok - i missed that.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/