[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0711300949070.3833-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 09:51:27 -0500 (EST)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>
cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Sample kset/ktype/kobject implementation
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Dave Young wrote:
> > The rule is simple enough. After calling kobject_register() you should
> > always use kobject_put() -- even if kobject_register() failed.
> >
> > In fact, after calling kobject_init() you should use kobject_put().
> > The first rule follows from this one, since kobject_register() calls
> > kobject_init() internally.
> >
> Hi,
> The behavior is not very clear here, the root problem is that :
>
> 1. Should we call kobject_put so cleanup work can be done by refcount
> touch zero or call kfree every time after kobject_register failed?
Call kobject_put so that the cleanup work will be done when the
refcount goes to 0. Don't call kfree.
> 2. If kobject_put calling is true, should this be done in
> kobject_register error handling codes or by hand after
> kobject_register failed?
It should be done by hand after kobject_register fails. Otherwise
kobject_register would end up dropping a reference that it never
acquired.
Alan Stern
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists