[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071130170655.GA10868@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:06:55 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "Metzger, Markus T" <markus.t.metzger@...el.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, tglx@...utronix.de,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com,
"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk-manpages@....net>,
markus.t.metzger@...il.com, Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/2] x86, ptrace: support for branch trace store(BTS)
* Metzger, Markus T <markus.t.metzger@...el.com> wrote:
> >> Not yet. We are talking to internal teams regarding gdb support.
> >
> >But you already have reasonably realistic test code right?
>
> I wrote a small program to talk to ptrace and look at the trace of
> small sample programs to test the patch. I do this on P4 32bit and
> Core2 64bit.
>
> Our debugger team has a prototype implementation for their debugger.
> But that will not be available for some time.
>
> I hope that we get gdb support, soon, but that would take a while if I
> had to do it.
i'm wondering what the main use-case would be then, and what the gdb
folks think about the current API. (Roland?)
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists