[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071130013605.GK9059@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:36:05 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "K. Prasad" <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dipankar@...ibm.com, ego@...ibm.com,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Markers Implementation for RCU Tracing
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 12:11:28AM +0530, K. Prasad wrote:
> Hi,
> Please review the ensuing set of patches which convert the
> existing RCU tracing mechanism for Preempt RCU and RCU Boost into
> markers.
>
> These patches are based upon the 2.6.24-rc2-rt1 kernel tree.
>
> Along with marker transition, the RCU Tracing infrastructure has also
> been modularised to be built as a kernel module, thereby enabling
> runtime changes to the RCU Tracing infrastructure.
>
> Patch [1/2] - Patch that converts the Preempt RCU tracing in
> rcupreempt.c into markers.
>
> Patch [1/2] - Patch that converts the Preempt RCU Boost tracing in
> rcupreempt-boost.c into markers.
Looks good to me, though I do not pretend to understand the markers
implementation. I presume that the markers implementation forces the
varargs usage -- though the markers do seem quite a bit nicer in allowing
the formatting to be specified more naturally.
Thanx, Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists