[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071130183512.GA8985@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 19:35:12 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] Per cpu relocation to ZERO and x86_32 percpu ops
on x86_64
* Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > you mean this single patch:
> >
> > modules-fold-percpu_modcopy-into-modulec-and-get-rid-of-the-macro-from-hell.patch
> >
> > that's the only patch i missed AFAICS.
>
> That is a pretty uncritical one. Then there is the fix of the zero
> address handling in modules.c, the fixup for the use of __per_cpu_xx
> variables in modules.c. etc.
you again talk about modules.c but my test kernel that crashes has no
modules at all.
> It would be best to test against mm since there are core changes here
> that will have to wait to the next merge period.
if you treat testing and review efforts like that they might have to
wait even longer :-( "My stuff is there somewhere amongst 1415 -mm
patches. Thank you for your interest and buzz off already."
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists