[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1196448122.19681.16.camel@localhost>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:42:02 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, mbligh@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] LTTng instrumentation mm (updated)
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 12:05 -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>
>
> Given a trace including :
> - Swapfiles initially used
> - multiple swapon/swapoff
> - swap in/out events
>
> We would like to be able to tell which swap file the information has
> been written to/read from at any given time during the trace.
Oh, tracing is expected to be on at all times? I figured someone would
encounter a problem, then turn it on to dig down a little deeper, then
turn it off.
As for why I care what is in /proc/swaps. Take a look at this:
struct swap_info_struct *
get_swap_info_struct(unsigned type)
{
return &swap_info[type];
}
Then, look at the proc functions:
static void *swap_next(struct seq_file *swap, void *v, loff_t *pos)
{
struct swap_info_struct *ptr;
struct swap_info_struct *endptr = swap_info + nr_swapfiles;
if (v == SEQ_START_TOKEN)
ptr = swap_info;
...
I guess if that swap_info[] has any holes, we can't relate indexes in
there right back to /proc/swaps, but maybe we should add some
information so that we _can_.
-- Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists