linux-kernel - Re: [patch 0/3] Per cpu relocation to ZERO and x86_32 percpu ops on x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711301043380.1919@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date:	Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:47:03 -0800 (PST)
From:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] Per cpu relocation to ZERO and x86_32 percpu ops on
 x86_64

On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> if you treat testing and review efforts like that they might have to 
> wait even longer :-( "My stuff is there somewhere amongst 1415 -mm 
> patches. Thank you for your interest and buzz off already."

Well I guess you have to get used to maintainership I think. F.e. the 
s390 people tested this patchset without requiring a backport. 
Typically arch maintainers test mm and do not force the patches back into 
mainline. I am a bit surprised since Andi and I never had this issue.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/