lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711301043380.1919@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date:	Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:47:03 -0800 (PST)
From:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] Per cpu relocation to ZERO and x86_32 percpu ops on
 x86_64

On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> if you treat testing and review efforts like that they might have to 
> wait even longer :-( "My stuff is there somewhere amongst 1415 -mm 
> patches. Thank you for your interest and buzz off already."

Well I guess you have to get used to maintainership I think. F.e. the 
s390 people tested this patchset without requiring a backport. 
Typically arch maintainers test mm and do not force the patches back into 
mainline. I am a bit surprised since Andi and I never had this issue.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ