linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.23: does it supposed to work on an i486?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47505FC6.9030208@zytor.com>
Date:	Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:08:54 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.23: does it supposed to work on an i486?

Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> It looks like 2.6.23.9 is missing checkin
>> 7ed192906a2144ebc8ca2925a85d27b9c5355668 from Linus' tree (attached),
>> which is necessary to work on 386 and 486.
> 
> Well, I applied the patch (in 2.6.23 it's
>  arch/i386/boot/pmjump.S,
> not
>  arch/x86/boot/pmjump.S,
> but that's minor) - still the same behavior, it still reboots
> instantly right when bootloader gave control to the kernel.
> So it must be something else.. ;)

Well, it's a good bet it's croaking somewhere in the setup code 
(arch/{i386,x86}/boot).  Putting debugging statements there might help.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/