linux-kernel - Re: [patch 0/3] Per cpu relocation to ZERO and x86_32 percpu ops on x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071130202622.GA15006@elte.hu>
Date:	Fri, 30 Nov 2007 21:26:22 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] Per cpu relocation to ZERO and x86_32 percpu ops
	on x86_64


* Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> wrote:

> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > This was not any "formal" x86 maintainance activity - your patches are 
> > still cooking. But i was thinking about maybe putting these patches into 
> > the x86 test grind to get them shaken out some more the random 1000 
> > bootup tests a day that it does. When integrating your patches I found a 
> > bug and tentatively reported it to you, pointing out that it could 
> > easily be my merge fault. Basically i was offering you to let your 
> > patches cook in another kitchen as well. I never before had a negative 
> > response to that :-/
> 
> You could have asked me for a patch against the x86 tree instead of 
> forcing these into your tree. [...]

ugh? What i did was something even better: i merged your patches myself 
(with some caveats, which i pointed out). That's something that people 
consider as a "cool, you just saved me some work!" moment, not a "hey, 
dont you dare forcing MY patches into your tree" incident ;-) At least 
that's how 99.9% of the people on lkml typically see it.

You really need to take a vacation ASAP! =B-)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/