[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47509D56.7010605@tmr.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:31:34 -0500
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
To: David Newall <david@...idnewall.com>
CC: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>,
Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@...e.fr>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Ben.Crowhurst@...llatravel.co.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kernel Development & Objective-C
David Newall wrote:
> Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> On Nov 30 2007 11:20, Xavier Bestel wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 19:09 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> Has Objective-C ever been considered for kernel development?
>>>>>>
>>>>> Why not C# instead ?
>>>>>
>>>> Why not Haskell nor Erlang instead ? :-D
>>>>
>>> I heard of a bash compiler. That would enable development time
>>> rationalization and maximize the collaborative convergence of a
>>> community-oriented synergy.
>>>
>>>
>> Fortran90 it has to be.
>
> It used to be written in BCPL; or was that Multics?
BCPL was typeless, as was the successor B (between Bell Labs and GE we
write thousands of lines of B, ported to 8080, GE600, etc). C introduced
types, and the rest is history. Multics is written in PL/1, and I wrote
a lot of PL/1 subset G back when as well. You don't know slow compile
until you get a seven pass compiler with each pass on floppy.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists