linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Avoid overflows in kernel/time.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <474F7DC4.8000607@zytor.com>
Date:	Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:04:36 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Avoid overflows in kernel/time.c

Chris Snook wrote:
> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> NOTE: This patch uses a bc(1) script to compute the appropriate
>> constants.
> 
> Perhaps dc would be more appropriate?  That's included in busybox.
> 

Perhaps it would, but I think there is more variability between dc 
implementations -- consider if the busybox version is broken, for eample.

Either way, how many people compile their kernels in a busybox environment?

Anyway, I don't think compiling bc is hard on anything which has a C 
compiler.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/