[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071130001029.GA17936@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 01:10:29 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Albert Cahalan <acahalan@...il.com>,
Guillaume Chazarain <guichaz@...oo.fr>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mm-commits@...r.kernel.org,
oleg@...sign.ru, rjw@...k.pl, roland@...hat.com, xemul@...nvz.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: + proc-fix-the-threaded-proc-self.patch added to -mm tree
* Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
> > You'll never run out of this sort of problem. Keeping Linux lean and
> > simple would be far better.
>
> Nah. The control group stuff has all kinds of corner cases because it
> is a new and untested API. The namespace work after we get the code
> cleanup up so it is maintainable and we can work with it is usually
> just finding our globals through a pointer instead of from a static
> variable. Hardly a measurable cost on the best day.
yeah - anyone who claims that containers are 'fat' has likely not even
looked at the code. Even maintainance-wise there's very visible positive
effects: we do discover and properly map our "global resource"
dependencies and abstract them. That increases cleanliness of our code
and APIs all around.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists