linux-kernel - Re: Kernel Development & Objective-C

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4751BE0D.3050609@argo.co.il>
Date:	Sat, 01 Dec 2007 22:03:25 +0200
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...o.co.il>
To:	Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com>
CC:	Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca>,
	Ben Crowhurst <Ben.Crowhurst@...llatravel.co.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kernel Development & Objective-C

Kyle Moffett wrote:
> In the kernel though, there are many codepaths where *every* *single* 
> instruction counts; that could be a serious performance hit.

Write *those* *codepaths* in *C* or *assembly*. But only after you 
manage to measure a difference compared to the object-oriented systems 
language.

[I really doubt there are that many of these; syscall 
entry/dispatch/exit, interrupt dispatch, context switch, what else?]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/