[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071201215602.7a4710d9@poseidon.drzeus.cx>
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 21:56:02 +0100
From: Pierre Ossman <drzeus@...eus.cx>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: m68k build failure
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:34:02 +0100 (CET)
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> >
> > Is there no directive we can stick in there that forces a reasonable alignment (e.g. alignment == sizeof(type)) independently of arch?
>
> We could use something like is used for compat_*.
> E.g. compare compat_s64 in <asm/compat.h> for x86 and powerpc.
>
Yeah, that could work. Have a header with stuff like this:
typedef u16 __attribute__((aligned(2))) aligned_u16;
typedef u32 __attribute__((aligned(4))) aligned_u32;
and let all structures in mod_devicetable.h use those types.
Now does anyone have the time to code and test this?
Rgds
Pierre
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists