[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1tzn23t6k.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 16:13:07 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, cornelia.huck@...ibm.com,
stern@...land.harvard.edu, kay.sievers@...y.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: namespace support requires network modules to say "GPL"
Mark Lord <lkml@....ca> writes:
> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>> On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 15:21:12 -0500
>> Mark Lord <lkml@....ca> wrote:
>>
>>> Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>>> Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
>>>> Sure. We keep the updated dev_get_by_XXXX that takes a network
>>>> namespace parameter.
>>> ..
>>>
>>> And what should code be passing in when "# CONFIG_NET_NS is not set" ?
>>
>> network drivers probably really really don't want to call
>> dev_get_by_XXX...
> ..
>
> Fine. But all of them want to call sk_alloc(),
network drivers should be calling sk_alloc less then they should
call dev_get_by_XXXX. Only protocols call sk_alloc.
> and many want to do register_netdev().
I haven't even touched register_netdev.
> So what should they be using there ?
What are you having problems with?
It is hard to answer specific questions without a context.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists