lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4750DCDC.8030306@rtr.ca>
Date:	Fri, 30 Nov 2007 23:02:36 -0500
From:	Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc:	"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, abelay@...ell.com,
	lenb@...nel.org, rjw@...k.pl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: + restore-missing-sysfs-max_cstate-attr.patch added to -mm tree

Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 22:44:25 -0500
> Mark Lord <lkml@....ca> wrote:
>>> all you need to do in your kernel module is call
>>>
>>> add_latency_constraint("mark_wants_his_mouse", 5);
>> Okay, and how to change it back again?  (thanks)
> 
> 
> sorry I misremember it's called
> set_acceptable_latency("mark", 5);
> 
> and to remove the constraint again you just do
> 
> remove_acceptable_latency("mark");
> 
> (and there's modify_ too to change existing)
> 
>> Then why not have a sysfs entry for scripts to write tsoro
>> to trigger the exact same end result?  :)
> 
> that's what is in current -mm pretty much
> well not sysfs, but it goes via a file descriptor
> (so that if the process that sets the contraint dies, the latency
> requirement can be given up automatically)
...

But doesn't that approach also make it nearly impossible to script ????

Having to hack source for any apps that one wants to use it on
sounds rather barbaric.. 

(sure I *can* still script it, with background tasksand wait and ..
 but that's getting rather complex again).

Meanwhile.. I'll now cook up a module to try the set/remove_acceptable_latency thing.

Thanks
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ