[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071201074400.GA14709@elte.hu>
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 08:44:00 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
Cc: rtc-linux@...glegroups.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.24-rc3] rtc-cmos alarm acts as oneshot
* David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net> wrote:
> Start making the rtc-cmos alarm act more like a oneshot alarm by
> disabling that alarm after its IRQ fires. (ACPI hooks are also
> needed.)
>
> The Linux RTC framework has previously been a bit vague in this area,
> but any other behavior is problematic and not very portable. RTCs
> with full YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM[:SS] alarms won't have a problem here.
> Only ones with partial match criteria, with the most visible example
> being the PC RTC, get confused. (Because the criteria will match
> repeatedly.)
>
> Update comments relating to that oneshot behavior and timezone
> handling. (Timezones are another issue that's mostly visible with
> rtc-cmos. That's because PCs often dual-boot MS-Windows, which likes
> its RTC to match local wall-clock time instead of UTC.)
Cool. I'm still wondering about:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7014
basically, we had universally working /dev/rtc before, now it appears we
dont have it anymore. Or were the problems in this bugzilla present with
the old code too?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists