[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47516646.9000803@scram.de>
Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 14:48:54 +0100
From: Jochen Friedrich <jochen@...am.de>
To: Vitaly Bordug <vitb@...nel.crashing.org>
CC: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] [NET] phy/fixed.c: rework to not duplicate PHY layer
functionality
Hi Vitaly,
> With that patch fixed.c now fully emulates MDIO bus, thus no need
> to duplicate PHY layer functionality. That, in turn, drastically
> simplifies the code, and drops down line count.
>
> As an additional bonus, now there is no need to register MDIO bus
> for each PHY, all emulated PHYs placed on the platform fixed MDIO bus.
> There is also no more need to pre-allocate PHYs via .config option,
> this is all now handled dynamically.
>
> p.s. Don't even try to understand patch content! Better: apply patch
> and look into resulting drivers/net/phy/fixed.c.
>
If i understand your code correctly, you seem to rely on the fact
that fixed_phy_add() is called before the fixed MDIO bus is scanned for
devices. How is this supposed to work for modules or for the
PPC_CPM_NEW_BINDING mode where the device tree is no longer scanned
during fs_soc initialization but during device initialization?
I tried to add fixed-phy support to fs_enet, but the fixed phy is not
found this way.
--- a/drivers/net/fs_enet/fs_enet-main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/fs_enet/fs_enet-main.c
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
#include <linux/fs.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/phy.h>
+#include <linux/phy_fixed.h>
#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
#include <asm/pgtable.h>
@@ -1174,8 +1175,24 @@ static int __devinit find_phy(struct device_node *np,
struct device_node *phynode, *mdionode;
struct resource res;
int ret = 0, len;
+ const u32 *data;
+ struct fixed_phy_status status = {};
+
+ data = of_get_property(np, "fixed-link", NULL);
+ if (data) {
+ status.link = 1;
+ status.duplex = data[1];
+ status.speed = data[2];
+
+ ret = fixed_phy_add(PHY_POLL, data[0], &status);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ snprintf(fpi->bus_id, 16, PHY_ID_FMT, 0, *data);
+ return 0;
+ }
- const u32 *data = of_get_property(np, "phy-handle", &len);
+ data = of_get_property(np, "phy-handle", &len);
if (!data || len != 4)
return -EINVAL;
Thanks,
Jochen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists