[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200712020155.00187.ioe-lkml@rameria.de>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2007 01:54:59 +0100
From: Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@...eria.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [feature] automatically detect hung TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE tasks
On Saturday 01 December 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> maybe, but we'd have to see how often this gets triggered. An OOM is
> something that could happen in any overloaded system - while a hung task
> is likely due to a kernel bug.
What about a client using hard mounted NFS shares here? That shouldn't be
killed by the OOM killer in that situation, should it?
Am I missing sth.?
Best Regards
Ingo Oeser
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists