[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47521010.7050309@zytor.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 17:53:20 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Avoid overflows in kernel/time.c
Alan Cox wrote:
>
> Its visibile for people doing PAL media processing and TV sync work.
>
> Longer term we have high precision timers and tickless so for now we can
> jut do the HZ == 300 math in steps to avoid the overflow. Slower but in
> time it won't matter.
>
Just use the patch... I don't think a dependency on bc will be a problem
for anyone (but it should, indeed, be documented -- together with
everything else we haven't documented yet.)
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists