lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2007 20:44:30 +0100 From: Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org> To: Avi Kivity <avi@...o.co.il> Cc: Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca>, Ben Crowhurst <Ben.Crowhurst@...llatravel.co.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Kernel Development & Objective-C On Sat, 1 December 2007 21:59:31 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > > Object orientation in C leaves much to be desired; see the huge number > of void pointers and container_of()s in the kernel. While true, this isn't such a bad problem. A language really sucks when it tries to disallow something useful. Back in university I was forced to write system software in pascal. Simple pointer arithmetic became a 5-line piece of code. Imo the main advantage of C is simply that it doesn't get in the way. Jörn -- But this is not to say that the main benefit of Linux and other GPL software is lower-cost. Control is the main benefit--cost is secondary. -- Bruce Perens -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists