linux-kernel - Re: Kernel Development & Objective-C

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071202194429.GA10657@lazybastard.org>
Date:	Sun, 2 Dec 2007 20:44:30 +0100
From:	Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>
To:	Avi Kivity <avi@...o.co.il>
Cc:	Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca>,
	Ben Crowhurst <Ben.Crowhurst@...llatravel.co.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kernel Development & Objective-C

On Sat, 1 December 2007 21:59:31 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> 
> Object orientation in C leaves much to be desired; see the huge number 
> of void pointers and container_of()s in the kernel.

While true, this isn't such a bad problem.  A language really sucks when
it tries to disallow something useful.  Back in university I was forced
to write system software in pascal.  Simple pointer arithmetic became a
5-line piece of code.

Imo the main advantage of C is simply that it doesn't get in the way.

Jörn

-- 
But this is not to say that the main benefit of Linux and other GPL
software is lower-cost. Control is the main benefit--cost is secondary.
-- Bruce Perens
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/