linux-kernel - 2.6.24-rc3-mm2 - add-64-bit-capability-support-to-the-kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <14896.1196497105@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date:	Sat, 01 Dec 2007 03:18:25 -0500
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Andrew Morgan <morgan@...nel.org>
Cc:	Serge Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: 2.6.24-rc3-mm2 - add-64-bit-capability-support-to-the-kernel

Question:

The patch does the semantic equivalent of:

-#define cap_clear(c)         do { cap_t(c) =  0; } while(0)
-#define cap_set_full(c)      do { cap_t(c) = ~0; } while(0)

+# define cap_clear(c)         do { (c) = __cap_empty_set; } while (0)
+# define cap_set_full(c)      do { (c) = __cap_full_set; } while (0)
+# define cap_set_init_eff(c)  do { (c) = __cap_init_eff_set; } while (0)

Was it intentional, or an oversight, that this blows chunks in modules
that try to use cap_clear() or cap_set_full() because the __cap_*
symbols don't get an EXPORT_SYMBOL() attached to them?

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped