[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.9999.0712020301180.29501@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2007 03:08:58 -0500 (EST)
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: any value in centralizing common 32/64 x86 content in
vmlinux.lds.S?
given the amount of common content between
arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux_32.lds.S and arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux_64.lds.S,
what about just defining macros for some of that stuff in
arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S and cutting down on all the duplication?
as is done in include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.S, why not just
define some handy macros, like:
#define INITRAMFS(align) \
. = ALIGN(align); \
.init.ramfs : AT(ADDR(.init.ramfs) - LOAD_OFFSET) { \
__initramfs_start = .; \
*(.init.ramfs) \
__initramfs_end = .; \
}
or something similar.
i'm guessing there's a fair amount of content like that that can be
coalesced, no? it would also standardize some of the niggling
differences between some of that content between the two files.
rday
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
========================================================================
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists