linux-kernel - Re: [BUG] Strange 1-second pauses during Resume-from-RAM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071202085607.GA28966@elte.hu>
Date:	Sun, 2 Dec 2007 09:56:08 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>
Cc:	Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Mark Lord <liml@....ca>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	len.brown@...el.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	rjw@...k.pl
Subject: Re: [BUG] Strange 1-second pauses during Resume-from-RAM


* Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org> wrote:

> > ah. You should mark pit_read() function as notrace. PIT clocksource 
> > is rare. (add the 'notrace' word to the function prototype)
> 
> Hardly a change at all.  Apart from some offsets, this dump is 
> identical.
> 
> stopped custom tracer.
> BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#0, sh/954
>  lock: c030f280, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: sh/954, .owner_cpu: 0
> Pid: 954, comm: sh Not tainted 2.6.24-rc3-ge1cca7e8-dirty #3
>  [<c0103a04>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x35/0x54
>  [<c010450a>] show_trace+0x2c/0x2e
>  [<c0104e6d>] dump_stack+0x84/0x8a
>  [<c01ded7c>] spin_bug+0xa7/0xae
>  [<c01def14>] _raw_spin_lock+0x45/0xfa
>  [<c02a02b1>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x68/0x7a
>  [<c01087e2>] pit_read+0xf/0x91
>  [<c0130ee1>] get_monotonic_cycles+0xf/0x2d
>  [<c013c0e7>] now+0x2a/0x7c
>  [<c013c333>] ____trace+0x4d/0x1e8
>  [<c013dbeb>] __mcount+0x95/0xa6
>  [<c010d354>] mcount+0x14/0x18
>  [<c0135a3c>] lock_acquired+0xe/0x1d7
>  [<c02a02b9>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x70/0x7a
>  [<c01087e2>] pit_read+0xf/0x91

hm, it seems lock_acquired() [in kernel/lockdep.c] needs to be marked 
'notrace' too - otherwise we recurse back into pit_read().

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/