[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071202113609.GA1796@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2007 12:36:09 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
Cc: rtc-linux@...glegroups.com,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@...ertech.it>
Subject: Re: RTC wakealarm write-only, still has 644 permissions
Hi!
> > > It's not an issue of accidental writes, it's an issue of there being
> > > no other synchronization for setting those alarms. Remember that both
> > > RTC_WKALM_SET and RTC_ALM_SET ioctls can set that same alarm, and so
> > > could a different userspace activity ...
> >
> > We have 3 interfaces to one hardware resource. I do not think kernel
> > should try to arbitrate it here. There's just one alarm clock with
> > three interfaces.
>
> Having three interfaces is bad enough ... ensuring that none of
> them can ever be used safely would be stupid.
They can be used safely. You just have to pick one and stay with
it. (And no, no-clobber hack does not help here. Or do you have
specific application where no-clobber hack helps?)
Anyway, with wildcarded dates, no-clobber is a problem -- because you
need to kill the alarm after you waken up, or it will repeat.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists