[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071203072328.371d0b00@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 07:23:28 -0800
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Radoslaw Szkodzinski <lkml@...ralstorm.puszkin.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [feature] automatically detect hung TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE tasks
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 11:27:15 +0100
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> > Kernel waiting 2 minutes on TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE is certainly
> > broken.
>
> What should it do when the NFS server doesn't answer anymore or
> when the network to the SAN RAID array located a few hundred KM away
> develops some hickup? Or just the SCSI driver decides to do lengthy
> error recovery -- you could argue that is broken if it takes longer
> than 2 minutes, but in practice these things are hard to test
> and to fix.
>
the scsi layer will have the IO totally aborted within that time anyway;
the retry timeout for disks is 30 seconds after all.
--
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@...ux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists