linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] kobject: add kobject_init_ng, kobject_add_ng, and kobject_init_and

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071203190626.GB21776@kroah.com>
Date:	Mon, 3 Dec 2007 11:06:26 -0800
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
	Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] kobject: add kobject_init_ng, kobject_add_ng, and
	kobject_init_and_add functions

On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 01:00:03PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 22:29:39 -0500 (EST),
> Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Greg KH wrote:
> > 
> > > +/**
> > > + * kobject_add_ng - the main kobject add function
> > > + * @kobj: the kobject to add
> > > + * @parent: pointer to the parent of the kobject.
> > > + *
> > > + * The kobject name is set and added to the kobject hierarchy in this
> > > + * function.
> > > + *
> > > + * If @parent is set, then the parent of the @kobj will be set to it.
> > > + * If @parent is NULL, then the parent of the @kobj will be set to the
> > > + * kobject associted with the kset assigned to this kobject.  If no kset
> > > + * is assigned to the kobject, then the kobject will be located in the
> > > + * root of the sysfs tree.
> > > + *
> > > + * If this function returns an error, kobject_put() must be called to
> > > + * properly clean up the memory associated with the object.
> > > + *
> > > + * If the function is successful, the only way to properly clean up the
> > > + * memory is with a call to kobject_del().
> > 
> > In which case kobject_put() isn't needed?
> 
> kobject_del() should only undo what kobject_add() did. So kobject_put()
> will still be needed to clean up the memory. Perhaps the wording should
> be:
> 
> If the function is successful, the only way to properly clean up the
> kobject is to call kobject_del() for removing the kobject from the
> hierarchy and to subsequently call kobject_put() to clean up the memory.

But that's not what the code does today in the kobject_del() function.
So for now, let's leave what we have.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/