linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][AT91] Fix compile error for at91rm9200 in latest git

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cd73a99e0712031202u71efc0e1g8cf910760475bb5d@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 3 Dec 2007 22:02:33 +0200
From:	"Andrew Victor" <avictor.za@...il.com>
To:	"David Brownell" <david-b@...bell.net>
Cc:	"Jan Altenberg" <jan.altenberg@...utronix.de>, linux@...im.org.za,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH][AT91] Fix compile error for at91rm9200 in latest git

hi,

> Which is a combination of two patches, which seems to have dropped the
> chunk you show below.  The reason this seems to have my signoff is
> that I originated one of those patches, and parts of the second, but
> in fact I had never seen f230d3f53d72d05bcb5666ab7e2eccd49c8b3a15
> until after this email ...

I guess in my rush to get those patches submitted before leaving SAN
People I missed that chunk.  Sorry.

David: The Signed-off line was kept as-is to keep the attribution correct.


> Your patch looks correct, and seems to be the only obvious chunk
> that's missing.  So, I'll ack it FWIW ... usual policy for these
> patches is to go through Russell.

You can add my Ack for what it's worth.


Regards,
  Andrew Victor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/