[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071203211904.GO17536@waste.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 15:19:05 -0600
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
acme@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add EXPORT_SYMBOL(ksize);
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 04:07:33PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 08:41:44PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > > We couldn't know how much memory was allocated by kmalloc() in 2.4 era, and we can know it 2.6 era.
> > > But are we going back to 2.4 era for out-of-tree kernel modules?
>
> On Dec 3, 2007 3:57 PM, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> wrote:
> > The interesting fact is that there are zero in-kernel modules using it.
>
> Yeah, and now that we have krealloc() I don't expect that many callers
> actually need ksize() either.
Yes, most of them ought not exist.
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists