linux-kernel - RE: what happened to RELATIME?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 4 Dec 2007 00:46:04 +0100
From:	"Joakim Tjernlund" <joakim.tjernlund@...nsmode.se>
To:	"'Mark Fasheh'" <mark.fasheh@...cle.com>
Cc:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: what happened to RELATIME?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Fasheh [mailto:mark.fasheh@...cle.com] 
> Sent: den 3 december 2007 22:34
> To: Joakim Tjernlund
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: what happened to RELATIME?
> 
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 09:16:15PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > Looking in 2.6.23 sources it seems like only ocfs2 has added
> > support for RELATIME. Was RELATIME a bad idea or is there
> > some other reason other filesystems hasn't added support?
> 
> Ocfs2 just needs a bit of explicit support - as far as I 
> recall, other file
> systems should have gotten it automagically via the generic 
> vfs changes.
> 	--Mark

Ahh, that explains it. Can anyone confirm that all in
FS:es honours relatime?

Thanks, Jocke

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/