[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.9999.0712031231370.6765@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 12:34:17 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>
cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@....tglx.de>,
Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@...eus.cx>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fedora's latest gcc produces unbootable kernels
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 09:17:22AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > I looked at the disassembly but I can not spot the problem.
> >
> > I think the real problem is somewhere else. Likely candidates are
> > hrtimer_forward() or hrtimer_start() - in that order.
>
> Should be hopefully fixed in latest Fedora gcc. The problem was in code like
> typedef union { long long int s; } U;
> typedef struct { U u; } S;
>
> void foo (S *s, long long int x, unsigned long int y)
> {
> s->u = ({ (U) { .s = s->u.s + x * y }; });
> }
>
> where a backport of a recent optimization of mine, without which gcc handles
> terribly initializers from compound literals (which is something hrtimer
> uses just everywhere - why can't ktime.h for #if BITS_PER_LONG == 64 || defined(CONFIG_KTIME_SCALAR)
> just use a scalar rather than union with a scalar in it??),
Of course just to annoy you :)
Seriously, we want the same code/initializers for both the scalar and the
sec/nsec case. That's where the union comes from.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists