[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200712032041.ABB90643.SOFVQFtMHFLOOJ@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 20:41:44 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: acme@...hat.com
Cc: bunk@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add EXPORT_SYMBOL(ksize);
Hello.
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > But I think ksize() should be available to kernel modules as well as kmalloc() etc.
> Why do you think so? You have to justify that with some valid use.
Is there an alternative function?
If not, it sounds to me that this is a regression.
We couldn't know how much memory was allocated by kmalloc() in 2.4 era, and we can know it 2.6 era.
But are we going back to 2.4 era for out-of-tree kernel modules?
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists