lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 14:58:17 +0300 From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> CC: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...nvz.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7][QUOTA] Move sysctl management code under ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL [snip] >> We do have some current code in the network stack that fails miserably >> when register_sysctl_table returns NULL, and there are explicit >> checks for that. > > So that code would be failing today with CONFIG_SYSCTL=n? Unless the > failing code is itself under #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL, in which case we don't > need to change anything? Exactly! If the code checks for the return value it won't work with CONFIG_SYSCTL=n, if it dies not - it may happily use the sysctl stub and avoid extra ifdefs. But this difference looks clumsy :( Thanks, Pavel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists