[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071204121623.GQ23294@kernel.dk>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 13:16:23 +0100
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@...jp.nec.com>
Cc: bharrosh@...asas.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
dm-devel@...hat.com, j-nomura@...jp.nec.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/28] blk_end_request: full I/O completion handler
(take 3)
On Fri, Nov 30 2007, Kiyoshi Ueda wrote:
> Hello Jens,
>
> The following is the updated patch-set for blk_end_request().
> Changes since the last version are only minor updates to catch up
> with the base kernel changes.
> Do you agree the implementation of blk_end_request()?
> If there's no problem, could you merge it to your tree?
> Or does it have to be merged to -mm tree first?
>
>
> Boaz,
> Could you review the newly added PATCH 27 which converts the bidi part,
> and give me your comments?
> It uses blk_end_request_callback() in PATCH 25, which was only for
> the tricky ide-cd driver.
> If bidi added a 'resid' member to struct request instead of reusing
> 'data_len' for the other purpose, it could use the standard
> blk_end_request() instead.
>
> ------------------ Changes from the previous post ---------------------
> Changes between take2 and take3:
> o Rebased on top of 2.6.24-rc3-mm2
OK, so this means that I can't apply it unfortunately. It depends on
other patches in -mm (bidi).
SCSI sits on block, so the best approach imho is to base this patchset
on mainline so I can include the block bits.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists