| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <631507.55601.qm@web32604.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 04:21:52 -0800 (PST) From: Martin Knoblauch <spamtrap@...bisoft.de> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Stack warning from 2.6.24-rc ----- Original Message ---- > From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> > To: Martin Knoblauch <spamtrap@...bisoft.de> > Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org > Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2007 12:52:23 PM > Subject: Re: Stack warning from 2.6.24-rc > > > * Martin Knoblauch wrote: > > > I see the following stack warning(s) on a IBM x3650 (2xDual-Core, 8 > > GB, AACRAID with 6x146GB RAID5) running 2.6.24-rc3/rc4: > > > > [ 180.739846] mount.nfs used greatest stack depth: 3192 bytes left > > [ 666.121007] bash used greatest stack depth: 3160 bytes left > > > > Nothing bad has happened so far. The message does not show on a > > similarly configured HP/DL-380g4 (CCISS instead of AACRAID) running > > rc3. Anything to worry? Anything I can do to help debugging? > > those are generated by: > > CONFIG_DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW=y > CONFIG_DEBUG_STACK_USAGE=y > > and look quite harmless. If they were much closer to zero it would be > a problem. > > Ingo > OK, I will ignore it then. I was just surprised to see it. Thanks Martin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists